|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李敏,古晓东 戴强** 何流洋 杨旭煜 杨志松**.以大熊猫为代表的多物种廊道有效性评估——以拖乌山大熊猫廊道为例[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(02):1-8.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.03016]
 LI Min,GU Xiaodong,et al.uation of the effectiveness of multispecies corridor surrogated by Giant panda with the Giant panda corridor in Tuowushan a s an example[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2021,27(02):1-8.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.03016]
点击复制

以大熊猫为代表的多物种廊道有效性评估——以拖乌山大熊猫廊道为例()
分享到:

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
27卷
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
1-8
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2021-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
uation of the effectiveness of multispecies corridor surrogated by Giant panda with the Giant panda corridor in Tuowushan a s an example
作者:
李敏1 2 古晓东3 戴强1** 何流洋4 杨旭煜5 杨志松26**
1中国科学院成都生物研究所 成都 610041
2西华师范大学生命科学学院 南充 637002
3大熊猫国家公园四川管理局 成都 610041
4四川栗子坪国家级自然保护区管理局 石棉 6 25400
5四川省野生动物资源调查保护管理站 成都 6100 81
6四川省大熊猫研究院 成都 610081
Author(s):
LI Min1 2 GU Xiaodong3 DAI Qiang1** HE Liuyang4 YANG Xuyu5 & YANG Zhisong2 6**
1 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China 2 College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, China 3 Sichuan Administrative Bureau of Giant Panda National Park, Chengdu 610041 4 Management Bureau of Liziping National Nature Reserve, Shimian 625400, China 5 Sichuan Station of Wildlife Survey and Management, Chengdu 610081, China 6 Sichuan Giant Panda Research Institute , Chengdu 610081, China
关键词:
大熊猫旗舰种拖乌山多物种廊道
Keywords:
giant panda flagship species Tuowushan multispecies corridor
DOI:
10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.03016
摘要:
大熊猫作为旗舰种和伞护种,以其为代表开展保护活动能在保护大熊猫的同时保护其同域物种。与大熊猫一样,大熊猫同域物种也面临着栖息地破碎化而导致的隔离问题,因而需要建立廊道连通被隔离的种群。目前全国已经规划了多条大熊猫廊道,为评估大熊猫廊道能否缓解其他同域物种栖息地破碎化问题,探索以大熊猫为代理的多物种廊道规划方法,以已经规划的拖乌山大熊猫廊道为例,分析4种同域物种(豹猫、中华鬣羚、毛冠鹿和小熊猫)的廊道需求与大熊猫廊道的关系,探讨多物种廊道的规划方案。结果表明,研究区域4种同域物种的栖息地均存在不同程度的破碎化,而108国道和G5高速是造成栖息地破碎化的最大隔离因子。共识别出32条廊道需求,其中豹猫2条、中华鬣羚9条、毛冠鹿10条、小熊猫11条,而大熊猫廊道仅与中华鬣羚的一条廊道重叠,各同域物种之间廊道的重叠范围也较小。上述结果表明,以大熊猫廊道为基础规划的多物种廊道只能满足少数物种的部分廊道需求;因此在实际保护工作中,不能简单地以大熊猫廊道代替其他物种的廊道。
Abstract:
Since the giant panda has been identified as a flagship species and umbrella species, it is believed that corridors surrogated by the giant panda might protect sympatric species at the same time. Sympatric species also face the problem of isolation caused by the fragmentation of their habitats as well as giant pandas. Therefore, it is necessary to establish corridors to connect and be isolated. At present, many giant panda corridors have been planned across the country. To uate the effectiveness of giant panda corridor in alleviating habitat fragmentation and explore methods to plan multispecies corridors surrogated by the giant panda, this study references the planned giant panda corridor in Tuowushan to analyze the relationships between the demands across four sympatric species (i.e., the leopard cat, Chinese serow, tufted deer, and red panda) for corridors and the giant panda corridor and discuss the scheme for the multispecies corridor. The results show that the habitats of the four sympatric species were fragmented to varying degrees, and the National Highway 108 and Expressway G5 are the biggest isolation factors causing habitat fragmentation. In the study, a total of 32 corridor demands were identified, including two for leopard cats, nine for Chinese serow, ten for tufted deer, and eleven for red pandas. However, only one corridor for the Chinese serow overlapped the giant panda corridor, and the overlapping ranges of corridors for sympatric species are quite small. It is suggested that corridors for giant panda are far from enough for sympatric species.

相似文献/References:

[1]方盛国,张万诚,冯文和,等.大熊猫、黑熊和小熊猫毛发无机元素的比较[J].应用与环境生物学报,1995,1(03):232.
 Fang Shengguo,Zhang Wancheng,Feng Wenhe,et al.A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INORGANIC ELEMENTS IN THE HAIRS OF AILUROPODA MEIANOLEUCUS,SELENARCTOS THIBETANUS AND AILURUS FULGENS[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,1995,1(02):232.
[2]方盛国,冯文和,张安居,等.佛坪三官庙地区大熊猫种群数量的DNA指纹分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,1996,2(03):289.
 Fang Shengguo,Feng Wenhe,Zhang Anjn,et al.DNA FINGERPRINTING ANALYSIS OF THE POPULATION NUMBER OF GIANT PANDAS LIVING IN SANGUANMIAO IN FOPING[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,1996,2(02):289.
[3]余健秋,钟顺隆,李光汉,等.大熊猫人工育幼研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,1997,3(01):36.
 Yu Jianqiu,Zhong Shunlong,Li Guanghsn,et al.ARTIFICIAL FEEDING OF INFANT GIANT PANDA[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,1997,3(02):36.
[4]周世强,黄金燕,张亚辉,等.卧龙自然保护区大熊猫栖息地植物群落多样性Ⅴ:不同竹林的物种多样性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(02):180.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00180]
 ZHOU Shiqiang,HUANG Jinyan,ZHANG Yahui,et al.Diversity of Plant Community of Giant Panda’s Habitat in the Wolong Nature Reserve Ⅴ: Species Diversity in Different Bamboo Forests[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(02):180.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00180]
[5]范隆庆,董岚,张顺林,等.凉山山系大熊猫栖息地的景观格局[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(02):179.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00179]
 FAN Longqing,DONG Lan,ZHANG Shunlin,et al.Landscape Pattern of Giant Panda Habitat in the Liangshan Mountains, Sichuan, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(02):179.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00179]
[6]周世强,黄金燕,张亚辉,等.野化培训大熊猫采食和人为砍伐对拐棍竹无性系种群生物量的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(01):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00001]
 ZHOU Shiqiang,HUANG Jinyan,ZHANG Yahui,et al.Effects of Wildness Training Giant Pandas?Grazing and Artificial Harvesting on Clone Population Biomass of Umbrella Bamboo (Fargesia robusta)*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(02):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00001]
[7]侯宁,戴强,冉江洪,等.大相岭山系泥巴山大熊猫生境廊道设计[J].应用与环境生物学报,2014,20(06):1039.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.06003]
 HOU Ning,DAI Qiang,RAN Jianghong,et al.A corridor design for the giant panda in the Niba Mountain of China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2014,20(02):1039.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.06003]
[8]张晋东,李玉杰,王玉君,等.两种野生大熊猫种群数量调查方法对比[J].应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(06):1142.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.01010]
 ZHANG Jindong**,LI Yujie,WANG Yujun,et al.Comparison of two population investigation methods for wild giant pandas[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2017,23(02):1142.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.01010]
[9]晋蕾,周应敏,李才武,等.野化培训与放归、野生大熊猫肠道菌群的组成和变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(02):344.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.06007]
 JIN Lei#,ZHOU Yingmin#,LI Caiwu,et al.Composition and variation of gut microbiome of trained, preparatory reintroduced, reintroduced and wild giant pandas[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2019,25(02):344.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.06007]
[10]詹明晔,付小花,张姝,等.不同地区成体大熊猫肠道微生物结构差异性及其与纤维素消化能力的相关性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(03):736.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.201808012]
 ZHAN Mingye,FU Xiaohua,ZHANG Shu,et al.Differences of the intestinal microbial structure of adult giant panda in different regions and its correlation with the digestibility of cellulose[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2019,25(02):736.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.201808012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期 Received: 2020-03-09 接受日期 Accepted: 2020-06-02
国家自然科学基金项目(31772481)资助 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772481)
**通讯作者 Corresponding author (E-mail: daiqiang@cib.ac.cn; yangzhisong@126.com)
点击摘要页题目后的“PDF”可下载阅读全文;本文为已录用的作者修定稿,尚未经编辑全面修改。
引用本文请注明出处本刊;发表刊期和页码将以正式出版时的安排为准,但DOI确定不变。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-03