|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 HU Yi,HU Tingxing,HU Hongling,et al.Effects of drought stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora saplings[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2014,20(04):672-685.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.12019]





Effects of drought stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora saplings
胡义 胡庭兴 胡红玲 陈洪 王彬 李晗
1四川农业大学林学院 雅安 625014 2四川农业大学生态林业研究所 成都 611130
HU Yi HU Tingxing HU Hongling CHEN Hong WANG Bin LI Han
1College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China 2Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
Cinnamomum camphora drought stress photosynthetic characteristics water physiology growth
通过盆栽和持续干旱研究了干旱胁迫(以2 d为一个处理间隔,持续干旱0-16 d)对香樟(Cinnamomum camphora)幼树生长及光合特性的影响. 结果显示:(1)干旱胁迫下香樟幼树的地径、树高生长量受到了抑制. 轻度、中度干旱处理(干旱时间2-8 d)叶片含水量和叶片相对含水量与对照差异均不显著,重度干旱处理(干旱时间>10 d)下显著低于对照(P < 0.01);(2)干旱胁迫影响了香樟叶片光合作用的日变化进程,妨碍了其有机物质积累;(3)干旱胁迫下香樟叶片光合色素总量先升高后降低,在干旱第8天达到最高. 所有干旱处理的净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)均受到不同程度的抑制. 气孔因素和非气孔因素共同作用影响香樟幼树的光合作用,在干旱初期(干旱时间2-8 d)气孔因素起主导作用,干旱后期(干旱时间>10 d)非气孔因素起主导作用;(4)干旱胁迫下香樟幼树叶片的表观量子效率(AQY)、RuBP羧化速率(CE)、光补偿点(LCP)、光饱和点(LSP)及CO2补偿点(CCP)均显著降低,表明干旱会降低香樟幼树对环境中光照和CO2的利用及适应能力. 综上,干旱胁迫下香樟幼树的水分生理状况变差,光合能力及光合日变化进程受到影响,对环境中光照和CO2的利用及适应能力也明显降低,最终香樟幼树的形态生长受到抑制. 图3 表3 参35
Cinnamomum camphora is a broad-spectrum tree species wildly distributed in south China. However, the effects of drought stress on growth and photosynthesis of C. camphora are poorly understood. This paper aimed to study the response of young C. camphora trees to drought stress to provide theoretical reference for water management of C. camphora plantations. The experiment was conducted in greenhouse in Aug. 2013. Twenty-nine pots (27 cm in diameter and 25 cm in height) of C. camphora were treated with drought stress for continuously 0 d, 2 d … 16 d with a time interval of 2 d, respectively. After 16 d treatment, morphological traits of C. camphora saplings, diurnal variation of photosynthetic rate, light responses, CO2 responses, and some other biochemical parameters were determined. The results showed inhibited diameter increment (Zd) and height increment (Zh) under drought stress. Leaf water content (LWC) and leaf relative water content (LRWC) of the plants under mild and moderate drought (drought for 2-8 d) were not lower than those in the control, while those under severe drought (drought for more than 10 d) were significantly lower than those in the control (P < 0.01). Drought stress affected the diurnal variation of photosynthesis process of camphor leaves, resulting in inhibition of organic substances accumulation and decrease of height and diameter growth. The total amount of photosynthetic pigment increased first and then decreased under drought stress, peaking at 8 d. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) under all drought treatments were inhibited. The photosynthesis of C. camphora saplings was influenced by the combined action of stomatal and non-stomatal factors. At the beginning of drought (after 2-8 d drought), stomatal factors played a leading role, but during late drought (after 10 d drought) non-stomatal factors were more important ones. The apparent quantum yield (AQY), carboxylation rate of enzyme RuBP (CE), light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP) and CO2 compensation point (CCP) of C. camphora leaves significantly decreased under drought stress, indicating that drought could reduce the ability of light and CO2 utilization, and the acclimation of C. camphora saplings. The results suggested with drought stress, the water physiology of C. camphora saplings changed, their photosynthetic diurnal variation process impacted, and the adaptation ability to light and CO2 weakened, resulting in obvious inhibition on its growth and morphological traits.


1 Bailey RG. Ecosystem Geography with Separate Maps of the Oceans and Continents at 1:8000000 [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996
2 Maestre FT, Valladares F, Reynolds JF. Is the change of plant-plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments [J]. J Ecol, 2005, 93 (4): 748-757
3 陈珂, 蒋祺, 类延宝, 尹春英.植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37 (5): 1907-1908 [Chen C, Jiang Q, Lei YB, Yin CY. Physiological responses of plants to drought stress [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2009, 37 (5): 1907-1908]
4 吴福忠. 干旱胁迫与施氮条件下白刺花幼苗生长及其适应机制[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2008 [Wu FZ. The growth characteristics and adaptive mechanisms of Sophoradavidiiseeding under drought stress and N supply regimes [D]. Beijing: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008]
5 陈珂, 焦娟玉, 尹春英. 植物对水分胁迫的形态及生理响应[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2009, 48 (4): 992-995 [Chen K, Jiao JY, Yin CY. The morphological and physiological response of drought stress to plants [J]. Hubei Agric, 2009, 48 (4): 992-995]
6 Chaves SM, Pereira JS, Maroco J. Understanding plant response to drought from genes to the whole plant [J]. Funct Plant Biol, 2003, 89: 239-264.
7 赵天宏, 沈秀英, 杨德光. 水分胁迫及复水对玉米叶片叶绿素含量和光合作用的影响[J]. 杂粮作物, 2003, 23 (1): 33-35 [Zhao TH, Shen XY, Yang DG. Effects of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of maize leaves under water stress and rewatering [J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2003, 23 (1): 33-35]
8 孙彩霞, 沈秀瑛, 刘志刚. 作物抗旱性生理生化机制的研究现状和进展[J]. 杂粮作物, 2002, 22 (5): 285-288 [Sun CX, Shen XY, Liu ZG. Status and advances in studies on the physiology and biochemistry mechanism of crop drought resistance [J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2002, 22 (5): 285-288]
9 Lal A, Edwards GE. Analysis of inhibition of photosynthesis under water stress in the C4 species Amaranthuscruentus and Zea mays: electron transport, CO2 fixation and carboxylation capacity [J]. Austr J Plant Physiol, 1996, 23 (4): 403-412
10 刘志媛, 党选民, 曹振木. 土壤水分对黄秋葵苗期生长及光合作用的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2003, 24 (1): 70-73 [Liu ZY, Dang XM, Cao ZM. Effects of solid water content on growth and photosynthesis on Okara seedlings [J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2003, 24 (1): 70-73]
11 牟筱玲, 鲍啸. 土壤水分胁迫对棉花叶片水分状况及光合作用的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2003, 30 (9): 9-10 [Mou XL, Bao X. Soli water stress on cotton leaf water status and photosynthesis [J]. China Cotton, 2003, 30 (9): 9-10]
12 胡新生, 王世绩. 树木水分胁迫生理与耐旱性研究进展及展望[J]. 林业科学, 1998, 34 (2): 77-89 [Hu XS, Wang SJ. A review of studies on water stress and drought tolerance in tree spices [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 1998, 34 (2): 77-89]
13 韦小丽. 不同光环境下香樟、猴樟苗木的生态适应[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2003, 22 (3): 208-213 [Wei XL. Ecological adaption of Cinnamomumcamphora and Cinnamomumbodinieri seedlings in different light environment [J]. J Mount Agric Biol, 2003, 22 (3): 208-213]
14 田大伦, 罗勇, 项文化, 闫文德. 樟树幼树光合特性及其对CO2浓度和温度升高的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40 (5): 88-92 [Tian DL, Luo Y, Xiang WH, Yan WD. Photosynthetic characteristics of Cinnamomumcamphora and its response to elevation of CO2 and temperature [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2004, 40 (5): 88-92]
15 Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L. Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress [J]. For Ecol Manage, 2004, 201: 119-129
16 熊庆娥. 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 成都: 四川科技出版社, 2003 [Xiong QE. Plant Physiology Experiment Course [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Sci-tech Publishing House, 2003]
17 叶子飘. 光合作用对光合CO2响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34 (6): 727-740 [Ye ZP. A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34 (6): 727-740]
18 Marshall J, Rutledge RG, Blumwald E, Dumbroff EB. Reduction in turgid water volume in jack pine, white spruce and black spruce in response to drought and paclobutrazol [J]. Tree Physiol, 2000, 20 (10): 701-707
19 袁龙飞, 李文娆. 植物水分的吸收及其利用效率的研究进展[J]. 开封大学学报, 2008, 22 (4): 90-94 [Yuan LF, Li WX. Research advances on water-uptake and water use efficiency [J]. J Kaifeng Univ, 2008, 22 (4): 90-94]
20 王林和, 张国, 盛董智. 毛乌素沙地臭柏种子产量及更新的初步研究[J]. 林业科学, 1998, 34 (6): 105-112 [Wang LH, Wang G, Sheng DZ. A preliminary study on the seed yield and regeneration of Sabina vulgaris in maowususand [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 1998, 34 (6): 105-112]
21 柯世省. 干旱胁迫对夏蜡梅光合特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27 (6): 1209-1215 [Ke SX. Photosynthetic characteristics of Sinocalycanthuschinensis leaves under drought stress [J]. Acta Bot Bor-Occid Sin, 2007, 27 (6): 1209-1215]
22 朱教君, 康宏樟, 李智辉, 王国臣, 张日升. 水分胁迫对不同年龄沙地樟子松幼苗存活与光合特性影响[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25 (10): 2527-2533 [Zhu JJ, Kang HZ, Li ZH, Wang GC, Zhang RS. Impact of water stress on survival and photosynthesis of Mongolian pine seedlings on sandy land. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25 (10): 2527-2533]
23 尹丽, 胡庭兴, 刘永安, 姚史飞, 马娟, 刘文婷, 何操. 干旱胁迫对不同施氮水平麻疯树幼苗光合特性及生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 21 (3): 569-576 [Yin L, Hu TX, Liu WA, Yao SF, Ma J, Liu WT, He C. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and growth of Jatropha curcas seedlings under different nitrogen levels [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 21 (3): 569-576]
24 Carlos GM, Lorenzo L. Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress [J]. Plant Physiol, 2001, 126: 1196-1204
25 Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis [J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33 (1): 317-345
26 许大全. 光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1997, 33 (4): 241-244 [Xu DQ. Some problems in stomatal limitation analysis of photosynthesis [J]. Plant Physiol Commun, 1997, 33 (4): 241-244]
27 牛洪斌, 白润娥, 张宪. 水分胁迫对欧李光合速率日变化的影响[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版), 2000, 18 (2): 15-17 [Niu HB, Bai RE, Zhang X. Effect of water stress on Cerasus humilis diurnal changes of photosynthetic rate [J]. J Hubei inst Nationalities (Nat Sci), 2000, 18 (2): 15-17]
28 许大全, 沈允钢. 光合作用的限制因素[M]//叔文. 植物生理与分子生物学. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999 [Xu DQ, Shen YG. Limiting Factors in Photosynthesis [M]//Shu W. Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology. 2rd ed. Beijing: Science and Technology Press, 1999]
29 Willekens H, Van Camp W, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Langebarels C, Sandermann H Jr. Ozone, sulfur dioxide, and ultraviolet-B have similar effects on mRNA accumulation of antioxidant genes in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia L. [J]. Plant Physiol, 1994, 106 (3): 1007-1014
30 冯建灿, 胡秀丽, 毛训甲. 叶绿素荧光动力学在研究植物逆境生理中的应用. 经济林研究, 2002, 20 (4): 14-18 [Feng JC, Hu XL, Mao XJ. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics to plant physiology in adverse circumstance [J]. Econ For Res, 2002, 20 (4): 14-18]
31 Krause GH, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics [J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 1991, 42 (1): 313-349
32 吴秀华, 胡庭兴, 杨万勤, 陈洪, 胡红玲, 涂利华, . 巨桉凋落叶分解对菊苣生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23 (1): 1-8 [Wu XH, Hu TX, Yang WQ, Chen H, Hu HL, Tu LH. Effects of Eucalyptus grandis leaf litter decomposition on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Cichorium intybus [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23 (1): 1-8]
33 郭春芳, 孙云, 张木青. 土壤水分胁迫对茶树光合作用-光响应特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16 (6): 1413-1418 [Guo CF, Sun Y, Zhang MQ. Effects of soil water stress on photosynthetic light response curve of tea plant (Camelllia sinensis) [J]. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2008, 16 (6): 1413-1418]
34 胡红玲. 巨桉与几个速生树种幼树的耗水特性及其对干旱胁迫的响应[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012 [Hu HL. Water consumption characteristics of Eucalyptus grandis and several fast-growing tree species and their responses to drought stress [D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012]
35 王付欣, 谢德意, 王惠萍. 干旱胁迫对短季棉生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2001, 28 (11): 16-17 [Wang FX, Xie DY, Wang HP. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of short-season cotton [J]. China Cotton, 2001, 28 (11): 16-17]


 WANG Hongmei,BAO Weikai** & LI Fanglan.Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Two-years-old Sophora davidii Seedling Leaves to Different Water Stresses[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2008,14(04):757.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2008.00757]
 ZHANG Chunmei,ZOU Zhirong,ZHANG Zhixin,et al.Effects of Exogenous Spermidine on Reactive Oxygen Levels and Antioxidative System of Tomato Seedling under Polyethlene Glycol Stress[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(04):301.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00301]
 MA Shouchen,XU Bingcheng,LI Fengmin & HUANG Zhanbin.Effect of Root Pruning on Root Efficiency, Water Use and Yield of Winter Wheat[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(04):606.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00606]
 YU Menghao,SUN Guchou,ZHAO Ping.Climatic Control of Water Use Efficiency of Acacia mangium Forest Canopy[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(04):309.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00309]
 SUN Xia,GAO Xinfen.Effect of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Simulated Drought Stress on Seed Germination of Five Species of Indigofera L. from Dry Valleys[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(04):317.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00317]
 CAI Haixia,WU Fuzhong,YANG Wanqin.Effect of Simulated Drought Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme System of Four Native Species in the Ecotone Between the Minjiang Dry Valley and Mountain Forest[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(04):478.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00478]
[7]蔺万煌,HOFMANN Rainer W,STILWELL Stephen.干旱胁迫下5种三叶草的生长和生理反应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(04):580.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00580]
 LIN Wanhuang,HOFMANN Rainer W,STILWELL Stephen.Growth of Five Species of Trifolium and Their Physiological Responses to Drought Stress[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(04):580.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00580]
 SUN Jiliang,LI Liulin,TAO Shutian,et al.Effects of Drought Stress and Rewatering on Physiological Characteristics of Pear Seedling[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(04):218.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00218]
 PENG Xiaojue,LIU Rong,YANG Jing,et al.Construction and identification of a mixed cDNA library of rice roots under salt and drought stress using Gateway technology[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2014,20(04):291.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.00291]
 LUO Jie,ZHOU Guangliang,HU Tingxing,et al.Effects of drought stress on growth and physiological parameters of Machilus pingii seedlings[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(04):563.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.11005]


“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAC09B05)和“十二五”四川省农作物育种攻关项目(2011NZ0098-10)资助 Supported by the Key Sci-tech Project of the “Twelfth 5-year Plan” of China (2011BAC09B05), and the Crops Breeding Project of the “Twelfth 5-year Plan” of Sichuan Province (2011NZ0098-10)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-08-26