|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨琴,蒲红梅,赵学春,等.3种人工草地不同植被覆盖度实地测量方法比较[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(01):220-227.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.01045]
　YANG Qin,PU Hongmei,ZHAO Xuechun,et al.Comparison of different plant cover investigation methods for three artificial grasslands[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2021,27(01):220-227.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.01045]
点击复制

3种人工草地不同植被覆盖度实地测量方法比较()
分享到：

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
27卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
220-227
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of different plant cover investigation methods for three artificial grasslands
作者:
杨琴; 蒲红梅; 赵学春; 王志伟; 程华; 董瑞; 陈玉连; 金宝成
1贵州大学动物科学学院 贵阳 550025 2贵州省草业研究所 贵阳 550006 3兰州大学生命科学学院 兰州 730000
Author(s):
YANG Qin1;  PU Hongmei1;  ZHAO Xuechun1;  WANG Zhiwei2;  CHENG Hua3;  DONG Rui1;  CHEN Yulian1 & JIN Baocheng1?
1 College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China 2 Guizhou Provincial Institute of Prataculture, Guiyang 550006, China 3 School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
关键词:
人工草地; 目估法; 样线法; 误差; 照相法; 植被覆盖度
Keywords:
artificial grassland;  visual estimation;  line interception;  error;  photographic method;  plant cover
DOI:
10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.01045
摘要:
植被覆盖度是植被垂直投影面积占统计区域面积百分比；理想覆盖度实地测量方法耗时短，工具简单，结果准确，受人为因素影响小. 以结缕草（Zoysia japonica）、白三叶（Trifolium repens）和雀稗（Paspalum thunbergii）人工草地为研究对象，以照相法测量值为参考，比较样线法、目估法、样针法、点框架法、网格法1 × 1、网格法5 × 5、网格点法1 × 1和网格点法5 × 5等8种方法测量精度. 结果表明：样线法误差小于5%，耗时短，工具简单. 目估法误差大于样线法，适用于植被高度低且覆盖度较低或较高样方. 样针法误差大于样线法和目估法，误差受植被高度和茎叶硬度影响，适用于植被高度低且硬度较小样方. 点框架法、网格法和网格点法误差均较大，一般大于10%. 网格法误差受覆盖度和小网格边长影响，误差峰值出现在覆盖度接近65%的样方，误差随着小网格边长增加而增加. 8种方法测量值与照相法测量值均呈显著正相关（P < 0.05），因此对于类似人工草地，这些方法测量值可通过本文提供的拟合公式转化为真实值. 随着样方数量增加，8种方法误差均呈现出先降低后稳定趋势. 本研究推荐样线法作为类似人工草地覆盖度实地测量方法；未来应根据覆盖度、植被高度和硬度等特征选择适合的测量方法. （图4 表2 参46）
Abstract:
Plant cover is the percentage of the ground surface covered by vegetation material. An ideal plant cover investigation method should take minimum time, utilize easy-to-use field equipment, possess accurate results, and minimize interference from human operators. Three artificial grasslands, including Zoysia japonica, Trifolium repens, and Paspalum thunbergii, were explored in this study. The errors of eight investigation methods, including the line intercept, visual estimation, pin frequency, and point frame method, as well as the grid point method 1 × 1, and grid point method 5 × 5, grid method 1 × 1, and grid method 5 × 5, were compared for use in the three grasslands based on reference values acquired using the photographic method. The results showed that the line intercept method had errors of less than 5% and a low demand for field time and equipment. The visual estimation method had errors larger than the line intercept method; this method may be more suitable for short grasslands with very low or high plant cover. The pin frequency method had errors larger than the line intercept and visual estimation methods. The pin frequency method was mainly affected by the height and hardness of stems and leaves of plants, and is suitable for dwarf grasslands with low hardness. Most errors of the point frame method, grid point methods, and grid methods were greater than 10%. The errors of grid methods were affected by both plant cover and grid side length. The peak error of grid methods appeared on quadrats whose plant cover was approximately 65%, and the error increased with increasing grid side length. There were significant positive correlations (P < 0.05) between plant covers acquired by the eight investigation methods and those acquired by the photographic method, indicating that for similar artificial grasslands, the cover estimates of these methods could be transformed into the actual plant covers using the provided regression curves. With the increase in sampling quadrats, the errors decreased at first and finally reached a stable value. In summary, specific plant cover, height, and hardness characteristics of plants should be considered when choosing ground plant cover investigation methods in the future. This paper highlighted the line intercept method as a powerful technique for plant cover estimation of similar artificial grasslands.

参考文献/References:

1 Bonham CD. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013
2 张云霞, 李晓兵, 陈云浩. 草地植被盖度的多尺度遥感与实地测量方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18 (1): 85-93 [Zhang YX, Li XB, Chen YH. Overview of field and multi-scale remote sensing measurement approaches to grassland vegetation coverage [J]. Adv Earth Sci, 2003, 18 (1): 85-93]
3 Pimentel D, Kounang N. Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems [J]. Ecosystems, 1998, 1: 416-426
4 Kateb HE, Zhang H, Zhang P, Mosandl R. Soil erosion and surface runoff on different vegetation covers and slope gradients: a field experiment in Southern Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Catena, 2013, 105 (5): 1-10
5 Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments [J]. Earth Surf Proc Land, 1998, 23: 527-544
6 康琳琦, 周天财, 干友民, 孙建, 王金牛. 1984-2013年青藏高原土壤侵蚀时空变化特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (2): 245-253 [Kang LQ, Zhou TC, Gan YM, Sun J, Wang JN. Spatial and temporal patterns of soil erosion in the Tibetan Plateau from 1984 to 2013 [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (2): 245-253]
7 Jiang ZC, Lian YQ, Qin XQ. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, cause, and restoration [J]. Earth-Sci Rev, 2014, 132: 1-12
8 Kefi S, Rietkerk M, Alados, CL, Pueyo Y, Papanastasis VP, ElAich A, Ruiter PC. Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems [J]. Nature, 2007, 449: 213-217
9 Jin BC, Sun GJ, Zhang Y, Zou M, Ni XF, Luo K, Zhang X, Cheng H, Li F, Wu X. Livestock tracks transform resource distribution on terracette landscapes of the Loess Plateau [J]. Ecosphere, 2016, 7 (4): e01337
10 Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris AT. Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change [J]. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 2004, 29: 261-299
11 Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments [J]. Ecol Monogr, 1993, 63 (4), 327-366
12 张瑞红, 蔡文涛, 来利明, 周继华, 姜联合, 杜会, 王永吉, 郑元润. 鄂尔多斯高原本氏针茅与油蒿群落过渡过程中的植被动态[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (2): 200-206 [Zhang RH, Cai WT, Lai LM, Zhou JH, Jiang LH, Du H, Wang YJ, Zheng YR. Vegetation dynamics in succession process from Stipa bungeana to Artemisia ordosica in the Ordos Plateau [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (2): 200-206]
13 Purevdorj TS, Tateishi R, Ishiyama T, Honda Y. Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices [J]. Int J Remote Sens, 1998, 19 (18): 3519-3535
14 Eastwood JA, Yates MG, Thomson AG, Fuller RM. The reliability of vegetation indices for monitoring salt marsh vegetation cover [J]. Int J Remote Sens, 1997, 18: 3901-3907
15 金宝成, 陈家胜, 黄华, 赖富钱, 马金辉. 多层随机拟合法测量样方植被覆盖度[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 45 (3): 23-26 [Jin BC, Chen JS, Huang H, Lai FQ, Ma JH. Multilayer random coupled model to observe vegetation cover in sample areas [J]. J Lanzhou Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2009, 45 (3): 23-26]
16 Luscier JD, Thompson WL, Wilson JM, Gorham BE, Dragut LD. Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots [J]. Front Ecol Environ, 2006, 4 (8): 408-413
17 Vanha-Majamaa SM, Mikkol ST. Digitized photographs in pegetation analysis: a comparison of cover estimates [J]. Appl Veg Sci, 2000, 3 (1): 89-94
18 Zhou Q, Robson M, Pilesjo P. On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands [J]. Int J Remote Sens, 1998, 19 (9): 1815-1820
19 Floyd DA, Anderson JE. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover [J]. J Ecol, 1987, 75 (1): 221-228
20 Canfield RH. Measurement of grazing use by the line interception method [J]. J For, 1944, 42 (3): 192-194
21 Canfield RH. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation [J]. J For, 1941, 39: 388-394
22 Klime L. Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover [J]. J Veg Sci, 2003, 14 (6): 815-821
23 章文波, 符素华, 刘宝元. 目估法测量植被覆盖度的精度分析[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 37 (3): 402-408 [Zhang WB, Fu SH, Liu BY. Error assessment of visual estimation plant coverage [J]. J Beijing Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed ), 2001, 37 (3): 402-408]
24 Hatton TJ, Johnson WPS. Relationships of the error associated with ocular estimation and actual total cover [J]. J Range Manage, 1986, 39 (1): 91-92
25 Godinez-Alvarez H, Herrick J, Mattocks M, Toledo D, Zee JV. Comparison of three vegetation monitoring methods: their relative utility for ecological assessment and monitoring [J]. Ecol Ind, 2009, 9: 1001-1008
26 Brakenhielm S, Liu Q. Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring [J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1995, 79: 75-87
27 拉尔. 土壤侵蚀研究方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991 [Lal R, Soil Erosion Research Methods [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1991]
28 关法春, 梁正伟, 王忠红, 关志华. 方格法与数字图像法测定盐碱化草地植被盖度的比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2010, 41 (1): 130-133 [Guan FC, Liang ZW, Wang ZH, Guan ZH. Comparison of digital image method and graticulation method for vegetation coverage measurement in salinized grassland [J]. J NE Agric Univ, 2010, 41 (1): 130-133]
29 Zhou GQ, Liu SH. Estimating ground fractional vegetation cover using the double-exposure method [J]. Int J Remote Sens, 2015, 36 (24): 6085-6100
30 Karcher DE, Richardson MD, Purcell LC. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis [J]. Crop Sci, 2001, 41 (6): 1884-1888
31 章文波, 刘宝元, 吴敬东. 小区植被覆盖度动态快速测量方法研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2001, 21 (6): 60-63 [Zhang WB, Liu BY, Wu JD. Monitoring of plant coverage of plots by visual estimation and overhead photograph [J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2001, 21 (6): 60-63]
32 随金明, 宋乃平, 薛毅, 陈娟, 陈晓莹, 吴婷, 李敏岚. 基于照相法的荒漠草原植被覆盖度测定方法[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41 (2): 58-64 [Sui JM, Song NP, Xue Y, Chen J, Chen XY, Wu T, Li ML. The method of extracting vegetation coverage in the desert steppe based on photographic [J]. Chin J Grassl, 2019, 41 (2): 58-64]
33 路炳军, 刘洪鹄, 符素华, 章文波, 袁爱萍. 照相法结合数字图像技术计算植被覆盖度精度研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2007, 27 (1): 78-85 [Lu BJ, Liu HH, Fu SH, Zhang WB, Yuan AP. Accuracy and feasibility analysis of plant coverage measurement by overhead photograph and image processing [J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2007, 27 (1): 78-85]
34 丁肖, 邱新法, 高佳琦, 龚敬瑜. 基于手机相片的草地植被盖度估算方法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29 ( 6): 1017-1025 [Ding X, Qiu XF, Gao JQ, Gong JY. Research on estimation approach of grassland vegetation coverage based on cellphone photo [J]. Acta Agr Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29 (6): 1017-1025]
35 赵静, 杨焕波, 兰玉彬, 鲁力群, 贾鹏, 李志铭. 基于无人机可见光图像的夏季玉米植被覆盖度提取方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50 (5): 232-240 [ Zhao J, Yang HB, Lan YB, Lu LQ, Jia K, Li ZM. Extraction method of summer corn vegetation coverage based on visible light image of unmanned aerial vehicle [J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2019, 50 (5): 232-240]
36 章超斌, 李建龙, 张颖, 周伟, 钱育蓉, 杨峰. 基于RGB模式的一种草地盖度定量快速测定方法研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22 (4): 220-226 [Zhang CB, Li JL, Zhang Y, Zhou W, Qian YR, Yang F. A quantitative analysis method for measuring grassland coverage based on the RGB model [J]. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2013, 22 (4): 220-226]
37 宋雪峰, 董永平, 单丽燕, 刘同海. 用数码相机测定草地盖度的研究[J]. 内蒙古草业, 2004, 16 (4): 1-6 [Song XF, Dong YP, Shan LY, Liu TH. Study on the determination of grassland coverage by digital camera [J]. Inner Mongolia Pratacult, 2004, 16 (4): 1-6]
38 Coy A, Rankine D, Taylor M, Nielsen D, Cohen J. Increasing the accuracy and automation of fractional vegetation cover estimation from digital photographs [J]. Remote Sense, 2016, 8 (7): 1-14
39 Wambolt CL, Frisina MR, Knapp SJ. Effect of method, site, and taxon on line-intercept estimates of sagebrush cover [J]. Wildlife Soc Bull, 2006, 34 (2): 440-445
40 Brun JM, Box TW. A comparison of line intercepts and random point frames for sampling desert shrub vegetation [J]. J Range Manage, 1963, 16 (1): 21-25
41 Kinsinger FE, Eckert RE, Currie PO. A comparison of the line-interception, variable-plot and loop methods as used to measure shrub-crown cover [J]. J Range Manage, 1960, 13 (1): 17-21
42 Zhou Q, Robson M. Automated rangeland vegetation cover and density estimation using ground digital images and a spectral-contextual classifier [J]. Int Remote Sens, 2001, 22 (17): 3457-3470
43 李苗苗. 植被覆盖度的遥感估算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院遥感应用研究所, 2003 [Li MM. The method of vegetation fraction estimation by remote sensing [D]. Beijing: Institute of Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003]
44 贵州省农业厅, 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 贵州土壤[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1980 [Guizhou Provincial Department of Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Soil of Guizhou [M]. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House, 1980]
45 Li XB, Chen YH, Yang H, Zhang YX. Improvement, comparison, and application of field measurement methods for grassland vegetation fractional coverage [J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47 (9): 1074-1083
46 Fiala ACS, Garman SL, Gray AN. Comparison of five cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades [J]. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 232: 188-197

相似文献/References:

[1]王启兰,王长庭,刘伟,等.江河源区人工草地植物群落和土壤酶活性变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(05):662.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00662]
　WANG Qilan,WANG Changting,LIU Wei,et al.Changes in Plant Communities and Soil Enzyme Activities of Artificial Grasslands in Headwater Areas of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(01):662.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00662]
[2]杨希智,王长庭,字洪标,等.三江源区不同建植年限人工草地土壤微生物群落结构特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(02):341.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.10033]
　YANG Xizhi,WANG Changting,ZI Hongbiao,et al.Soil microbial community structure characteristics in artificial grassland with different cultivation years in the headwater region of Three Rivers, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(01):341.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.10033]
[3]欧延升,汪霞,李佳,等.不同恢复年限人工草地土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(01):38.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.05005]
　OU Yansheng,WANG Xia**,LI Jia,et al.Content and ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in artificial grassland under different restoration years[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2019,25(01):38.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.05005]
[4]毛军,王长庭,胡雷,等.三江源区不同建植期禾草混播人工草地植物群落根系特征变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(06):1538.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.08006]
　MAO Jun,WANG Changting,HU Lei & ZI Hongbiao.Root dynamics of mixed artificial grasslands with different cultivation periods in the Source Region of Three Rivers in China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2021,27(01):1538.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.08006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-25