|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈法霖,张凯,郑华,等.PCR-DGGE技术解析针叶和阔叶凋落物混合分解对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(02):145-150.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00145]
 CHEN Falin,ZHANG Kai,ZHENG Hua,et al.Analyzing the Effect of Mixed Decomposition of Conifer and Broadleaf Litters on Soil Microbial Communities by Using PCR-DGGE[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(02):145-150.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00145]
点击复制

PCR-DGGE技术解析针叶和阔叶凋落物混合分解对土壤微生物群落结构的影响()
分享到:

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
17卷
期数:
2011年02期
页码:
145-150
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2011-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analyzing the Effect of Mixed Decomposition of Conifer and Broadleaf Litters on Soil Microbial Communities by Using PCR-DGGE
作者:
陈法霖张凯郑华林学强欧阳志云屠乃美
(1中国科学院生态环境研究中心,城市与区域生态国家重点实验室 北京 100085)
(2海南省环境科学研究院 海口 570206)
(3湖南农业大学农学院 长沙 410128)
Author(s):
CHEN Falin ZHANG Kai ZHENG Hua LIN Xueqiang OUYANG Zhiyun TU Naimei
(1State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)
(2Hainan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Haikou 570206, China)
(3College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
关键词:
森林凋落物混合分解土壤微生物群落结构16S rDNA18S rDNA多样性DGGE
Keywords:
forest litter decomposition of mixed litter soil microbe community structure 16S rDNA 18S rDNA diversity DGGE
分类号:
S714.336
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00145
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为深入理解凋落物类型和微生物群落之间的相互关系,通过小盆+凋落袋控制实验,运用PCR-DGGE技术解析了南方红壤丘陵区典型针叶树种马尾松和湿地松的凋落物分别与白栎、青冈两个阔叶树种凋落物混合分解对土壤微生物基因型多样性的影响. 结果表明:1)针叶凋落物中加入阔叶后细菌群落结构未发生显著变化,将所有处理归为一类的相似度达72%,其差异仅表现在马尾松+白栎和湿地松+青冈处理土壤微生物群落16S rDNA的丰富度和多样性分别显著高于单一马尾松和湿地松;2)针叶凋落物中加入阔叶后真菌群落结构发生了显著变化,单一针叶处理与针阔混合处理间18S rDNA基因泳道带型的相似度只有28%,并且单一马尾松处理土壤18S rDNA的丰富度和多样性显著高于马尾松+白栎和马尾松+青冈,单一湿地松处理土壤18S rDNA的丰富度也显著高于湿地松+白栎和湿地松+青冈,多样性显著高于湿地松+白栎处理;3)土壤真菌18S rDNA的丰富度与凋落物初始C含量呈显著正相关,与凋落物初始N含量呈显著负相关. 针叶凋落物中引入阔叶凋落物后,增加了凋落物中N的比重,C的比重则下降,显著影响了土壤真菌群落的结构. 图3 表4 参36
Abstract:
Clarifying the microbiological mechanism of litter decomposition is of great significance, especially in understanding how the soil microbial communities affect the decomposition of mixed litters with conifer and broadleaf trees. In this study, a simulation experiment was designed with flowerpots, and the litters of the typical species in the southern hilly red soil region, including Pinus massoniana (PM), Pinus elliottii (PE), Quercus fabri (QF) and Cyclobalanopsis glauca (CG), were investigated as study materials. The effects of the decomposition of the mixed litters on the genotypic diversity of soil microbial communities were studied by using PCR-DGGE method. The results indicated: 1) No significant change occurred in bacterial community structure and the lowest similarity was 72% if all treatments were graded as one class after mixing broadleaf litter with conifer litter. The differences were that the richness and diversity of 16S rDNA in PM+QF and PE+CG were significantly higher than that of single-conifer litter of PM and PE, respectively; 2) Fungal community structure significantly changed and the similarity between the single-conifer litter treatment and the mixed litter treatment was only 28%. The richness and diversity of 18S rDNA in PM were significantly higher than those of PM+CG. The richness of 18S rDNA in PE was also significantly higher than that of PE+QF and PE+CG, and the diversity was significantly higher than that of PE+QF; 3) The richness of 18S rDNA was positively related with initial carbon content of litter, but significantly negative with initial nitrogen content of litter. After mixing broadleaf litter with conifer litter, the proportion of nitrogen in litters increased, but the proportion of carbon declined significantly, which significantly affected the soil fungal community structure. Fig 3, Tab 4, Ref 36

参考文献/References:

1 Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1979
2 Cadish G, Giller KE. Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. CAB International, 1997
3 Badejo MA, Tian G. Abundance of soil mites under four agroforestry tree species with contrasting litter quality. Biol Fert Soils, 1999, 30 (1~2): 107~112
4 Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos, 2004, 104 (2): 230~246
5 Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition? Oecologia, 2003, 137 (4): 578~586
6 Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. Biodiversity and plant litter: Experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos, 1997, 79 (2): 247~258
7 Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O, Gallet C. Determinants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 2003, 35 (6): 827~835
8 Joergensen RG, Wichern F. Quantitative assessment of the fungal contribution to microbial tissue in soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40 (12): 2977~2991
9 Coleman DC. From peds to paradoxes: Linkages between soil biota and their influences on ecological processes. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40 (2): 271~289
10 Hedlund K, Griffiths B, Christensen S, Scheu S, Setälä H, Tscharntke T, Verhoef H. Trophic interactions in changing landscapes: Responses of soil food webs. Basic Appl Ecol, 2004, 5 (6): 495~503
11 Holtkamp R, Kardol P, van der Wal A, Dekker SC, van der Putten WH, de Ruiter PC. Soil food web structure during ecosystem development after land abandonment. Appl Soil Ecol, 2008, 39 (1): 23~34
12 Torsvik V, ?vreås L. Microbial phylogeny and diversity in soil. In: van Elsas JD, Jansson JK, Trevors JT eds. Modern Soil Microbiology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2007. 23~54
13 Zheng H (郑华), Chen FL (陈法霖), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Fang ZG (方治国), Wang XK (王效科), Miao H (苗鸿). Utilization of different carbon sources types in Biolog-GN microplates by soil microbial communities from four forest types. Environ Sci (环境科学), 2007, 28 (5): 1126~1130
14 Bao SD (鲍士旦). Soil Agriculturalization Analysis. 3ird ed. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press (北京: 中国农业出版社), 2005
15 Yu ZT, Morrison M. Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microb, 2004, 70 (8): 4800~4806
16 Nübel U, Engelen B, Felske A, Snaidr J, Wieshuber A, Amann RI, Ludwig W, Backhaus H. Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J Bacteriol, 1996, 178 (19): 5636~5643
17 May LA, Smiley B, Schmidt MG. Comparative denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of fungal communities associated with whole plant corn silage. Can J Microbiol, 2001, 47 (9): 829~841
18 Muyzer G, Dewaal EC, Uitterlinden AG. Profiling of complex microbial-populations by denaturing gradient gel-electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes-coding for 16S ribosomal-RNA. Appl Environ Microb, 1993, 59 (3): 695~700
19 Bell T, Ager D, Song JI, Newman JA, Thompson IP, Lilley AK, van der Gast CJ. Larger islands house more bacterial taxa. Science, 2005, 308 (5730): 1884~1884
20 Reche I, Pulido-Villena E, Morales-Baquero R, Casamayor EO. Does ecosystem size determine aquatic bacterial richness? Ecology, 2005, 86 (7): 1715~1722
21 Chabrerie O, Laval K, Puget P, Desaire S, Alard D. Relationship between plant and soil microbial communities along a successional gradient in a chalk grassland in north-western France. Appl Soil Ecol, 2003, 24 (1):43~56
22 Hooper DU, Bignell DE, Brown VK, Brussard L, Dangerfield JM, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Coleman DC, Giller KE, Lavelle P, van der Putten WH, De Ruiter PC, Rusek J, Silver WL, Tiedje JM, Wolters V. Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks. Bioscience, 2000, 50 (12): 1049~1061
23 Costa R, Götz M, Mrotzek N, Lottmann J, Berg G, Smalla K. Effects of site and plant species on rhizosphere community structure as revealed by molecular analysis of microbial guilds. Fems Microbiol Ecol, 2006, 56 (2): 236~249
24 He XY, Wang KL, Zhang W, Chen ZH, Zhu YG, Chen HS. Positive correlation between soil bacterial metabolic and plant species diversity and bacterial and fungal diversity in a vegetation succession on Karst. Plant Soil, 2008, 307 (1~2): 123~134
25 Carlile MJ, Watkinson WC, Gooday GW. The Fungi. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Academic Press, 2001
26 Sakamoto K, Oba Y. Effect of fungal to bacterial biomass ratio on the relationship between CO2 evolution and total soil microbial biomass. Biol Fert Soils, 1994, 17 (1): 39~44
27 Högberg MN, Högberg P, Myrold DD. Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three? Oecologia, 2007, 150 (4): 590~601
28 Blagodatskaya EV, Anderson TH. Interactive effects of pH and substrate quality on the fungal-to-bacterial ratio and qCO2 of microbial communities in forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 1998, 30 (10~11): 1269~1274
29 Allison SD, Czimczik CI, Treseder KK. Microbial activity and soil respiration under nitrogen addition in Alaskan boreal forest. Global Change Biol, 2008, 14: 1156~1168
30 Allison, SD, Hanson CA, Treseder KK. Nitrogen fertilization reduces diversity and alters community structure of active fungi in boreal ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39: 1878~1887
31 Ingwersen J, Poll C, Streck T, Kandeler E. Micro-scale modelling of carbon turnover driven by microbial succession at a biogeochemical interface. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40 (4): 864~878
32 Högberg MN, Bååth E, Nordgren A, Arnebrant K, Högberg P. Contrasting effects of nitrogen availability on plant carbon supply to mycorrhizal fungi and saprotrophs - a hypothesis based on field observations in boreal forest. New Phytol, 2003, 160 (1): 225~238
33 Lin KM (林开敏), Zhang ZQ (章志琴), Zou SQ (邹双全), Cao GQ (曹光球). The influence of chinese fir mixed with broad-leaf litter decomposition on character of forest soil. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2006, 37 (2): 258~262
34 ChenFL (陈法霖), Zheng H (郑华), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Zhang K (张凯), Tu NM (屠乃美). Responses of microbial community structure to the leaf litter composition. Acta Pedol Sin (土壤学报), 2011, 48 (3): 603~611
35 Findlay S, Tank J, Dye S, Valett HM, Mulholland PJ, McDowell WH, Johnson SL, Hamilton SK, Edmonds J, Dodds WK. A cross-system comparison of bacterial and fungal biomass in detritus pools of headwater streams. Microb Ecol, 2002, 43 (1): 55~66
36 Gulis V, Suberkropp K. Effect of inorganic nutrients on relative contributions of fungi and bacteria to carbon flow from submerged decomposing leaf litter. Microb Ecol, 2003, 45 (1): 11~19

相似文献/References:

[1]林晗,陈辉,吴承祯,等.千年桐与毛竹凋落叶混合分解对土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(04):539.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00539]
 LIN Han,CHEN Hui,WU Chengzhen,et al.Effects of Decomposition of Aleurites montana and Phyllostachys pubescences Mixed Foliage Litter on Activity of Soil Enzymes[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(02):539.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00539]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(Nos. 40871130,30600474)资助
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-04-25