|Table of Contents|

Comparison of the bamboo-grazing behavior of giant pandas and livestock(PDF)

Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

Issue:
2021 05
Page:
1203-1209
Research Field:
Articles
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of the bamboo-grazing behavior of giant pandas and livestock
Author(s):
ZHOU Shiqiang1 2 3 4 ZHANG Jindong5 6 Vanessa Hull7 HUANG Jinyan1 2 3 4 LIU Dian1 2 3 4 XIE Hao1 2 3 4 ZOU Xiaoyan8 & ZHANG Hemin1 2 3 4?
1 China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China 2 Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Conservation Biology for Rare Animals of the Giant Panda State Park, Dujiangyan 611830, China 3 Qionglai Mountains Conservation Biology of Endangered Wild Animals and Plants National Permanent Scientific Research Base, Dujiangyan 611830, China 4 Minshan Mountains Conservation Biology of Endangered Wild Animals and Plants National Permanent Scientific Research Base, Dujiangyan 611830, China 5 China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, China 6 Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation of Ministry of Education, Nanchong 637002, China 7 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA 8 Wolong National Nature Reserve, Wenchuan 623006, China
Keywords:
giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) livestock foraging strategy feeding rate Wolong National Nature Reserve
CLC:
-
PACS:
DOI:
10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.08017
DocumentCode:

Abstract:
This study analyzed the characteristics of the bamboo grazing behaviors (food selection, resource intake rate) of wild giant pandas and livestock in Wolong National Nature Reserve to reveal the ecological mechanism of the impact of grazing livestock on giant panda bamboo resources and habitats. The study was analyzed using data from line transect surveys and the sample plot method. The results showed that wild giant panda foraging strategy not only had seasonal migratory characteristics, but also that these animals chose to feed on different species, age classes, and organs of the bamboo plant. However, livestock fed only on bamboo resources in the free-range area, and the branches and leaves of bamboo forest were the main foraging targets. This led to the giant pandas and livestock having different bamboo resource feeding intensities. Statistics showed that the feeding rates of grazing livestock and wild giant pandas were significantly different (P < 0.001). This study shows that although livestock and giant pandas display foraging behaviors with regard to bamboo species, there are clear differences caused by how these groups select bamboo in certain age classes and prefer particular organs, but because livestock feed mainly on bamboo branches and leaves, the photosynthetic efficiency of the bamboo was affected. This in turn led to a decrease in the growth of the pandas’ staple food, which have a low natural regeneration ability and can even die dry, thereby severely reducing the quality of bamboo resources available. Therefore, prohibiting grazing of livestock in giant panda habitat is an important measure to effectively conserve this species. The adjustment of the industrial structure of rural communities could definitely become an effective way to coordinate the protection of nature and development of communities.

References

1 Somveille? M, Rodrigues Ana SL, Manica A. Energy efficiency drives the global seasonal distribution of birds [J]. Nat Ecol Evol, 2018, 2: 962-969
2 Namgail T, Fox JL, Bhatnagar YV. Habitat shift and time budget of the Tibetan argali: The influence of livestock grazing [J]. Ecol Res, 2007, 22 (1): 25-31
3 蒋志刚. 食物、营养与动物采食[M]//蒋志刚主编. 动物行为原理与物种保护方法. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 102-124 [Jiang ZG. Food, nutrition and animal foraging [M]//Jiang ZG. Principles of Animal Behavior and Methods of Species Conservation. Beijing: Science Publishing House, 2004: 102-124]
4 Beck JL, Peek JM. Diet composition, forage selection, and potential for forage competition among elk, deer, and livestock on aspen-sagebrush summer range [J]. Rangeland Ecol Manag, 2005, 58 (2): 135-147
5 Young TP, Palmer TM, Gadd ME. Competition and compensation among cattle, zebras, and elephants in a semi-arid savanna in Laikipia, Kenya [J]. Biol Conser, 2005, 122 (2): 351-359
6 冉江洪, 刘少英, 王鸿加, 曾宗永, 孙志宇, 刘世昌. 小相岭大熊猫栖息地干扰调查[J]. 兽类学报, 2004, 24 (4): 277-281 [Ran JH, Liu SY, Wang HJ, Zeng ZY, Sun ZY, Liu SC. A survey of disturbance of giant panda habitat in the Xiaoxiangling mountains of Sichuan province [J]. Acta Theriol Sin, 2004, 24 (4): 277-281]
7 康东伟, 赵联军, 宋国华. 四川王朗国家级自然保护区大熊猫与家畜竞争关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39 (7): 74-76 [Kang DW, Zhao LJ, Song GH. Competition relationship between giant panda and livestock in Wanglang National Nature Reserve, Sichuan [J]. J Northeast For Uni, 2011, 39 (7): 74-76]
8 Hull V, Zhang JD, Zhou SQ, Huang JY, Viňa A. , Liu W, Tuanmu MN, Li RG, Liu D, Xu WH, Huang Y, Ouyang ZY, Zhang HM, Liu JG. Impact of livestock on giant pandas and their habitat [J]. J Nat Conser, 2014, 22 (3): 256–264
9 Li BV, Pimm SL, Li S, Zhao LJ, Luo CP. Free-ranging livestock threaten the long-term survival of giant pandas [J]. Biol Conser, 2017, 216, 18-25.
10 唐小平, 贾建生, 王志臣, 张德辉, 遇宝成, 岳建兵, 龚明昊, 刘洋. 全国第四次大熊猫调查方案设计及主要结果分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015 (1): 13-16 [Tang XP, Jia JS, Wang ZC, Zhang DH, Yu BC, Yue JB, Gong MH, Liu Y. Scheme design and main result analysis of the fourth national survey on giant pandas [J]. For Resour Manag, 2015 (1): 13-16]
11 Zhang JD, Hull V, Ouyang ZY, Li RG, Conner T, Yang HB, Zhang ZJ, Silet B, Zhang HM, Liu JG. Divergent responses of sympatric species to livestock encroachment at fine spatiotemporal scales [J]. Biol Conser, 2017, 209: 119-129
12 冉江洪, 刘少英, 王鸿加, 孙志宇, 曾宗永, 刘世昌. 小相岭大熊猫与放牧家畜的生境选择[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23 (11): 2253-2259 [ Ran JH, Liu SY, Wang HJ, Sun ZY, Zeng ZY, Liu SC. Habitat selection by giant pandas and grazing livestock in the Xiaoxiangling mountains of Sichuan province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2003, 23 (11): 2253-2259]
13 冉江洪, 刘少英, 王鸿加, 孙志宇, 曾宗永, 刘世昌. 放牧对冶勒自然保护区大熊猫生境的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2003, 23 (4): 288–294 [Ran JH, Liu SY, Wang HJ, Sun ZY, Zeng ZY, Liu SC. Effect of grazing on giant pandas’ habitat in Yele Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Theriol Sin, 2003, 23 (4): 288–294]
14 黄金燕, 刘 巅, 张明春, 谢浩, 周世强, 李仁贵, 张晋东, 周小平, 黄炎, 李德生, 张和民. 放牧对卧龙大熊猫栖息地草本植物物种多样性与竹子生长影响[J]. 竹子学报, 2017, 36 (2): 57-64 [Huang JY, Liu D, Zhang MC, Xie H, Zhou SQ, Li RG, Zhang JD, Zhou XP, Huang Y, Li DS, Zhang HM. Grazing impacts on the herbaceous species diversity and bamboo growth in the giant panda habitat in Wolong National Nature Reserve [J]. J Bamboo Res, 2017, 36 (2): 57-64]
15 王晓, 侯金, 张晋东, 白文科, 黄金燕, 周世强, 欧阳志云.同域分布的珍稀野生动物对放牧的行为响应策略[J]. 生态学报,2018, 38 (18): 6484-6492 [Wang X, Hou J, Zhang JD, Bai WK, Huang JY, Zhou SQ, Ouyang ZY. Divergent behavioral responses of sympatric species to grazing disturbance [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38 (18): 6484-6492]
16 胡锦矗, 夏勒, 潘文石, 朱靖. 卧龙的大熊猫[M]. 成都: 四川科技出版社, 1985, 33-77 [Hu JC, Schaller GB, Pan WS, Zhu J. Wolong’s Giant Panda [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1985, 33-77]
17 潘文石, 吕植, 朱小健, 王大军, 王昊, 龙玉, 傅达莉, 周欣. 继续生存的机会[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2001: 1-522 [Pan WS, Lü Z, Zhu XJ, Wang DJ, Wang H, Long Y, Fu DL, Zhou X. A Chance for Lasting Survival [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001: 1-522]
18 Prins HHT, Langevelde Frank. Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging [M]. The Netherlands: Springer Press, 2008: 1-272
19 Liu XH, Skidmore AK, Wang TJ, Yong YG, Prins HHT. Giant panda movements in Foping Nature Reserve, China [J]. J Wildlife Manag, 2002, 66 (4): 1179-1188
20 Zhang Z, Sheppard JK, Swaisgood RR, Wang G, Nie Y, Wei W, Zhao N, Wei F. Ecological scale and seasonal heterogeneity in the spatial behaviors of giant pandas [J]. Integr Zool, 2014, 9 (1): 46-60
21 周世强, Hull V, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 刘巅, 黄 炎, 李德生, 张和民. 野生大熊猫与放牧家畜的空间利用格局比较[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36 (2): 138-151 [Zhou SQ, Hull V, Zhang JD, Huang JY, Liu D, Huang Y, Li DS, Zhang HM. Comparative space use patterns of wild giant pandas and livestock [J]. Acta Theriol Sin, 2016, 36 (2): 138-151]
22 周世强, 张晋东, Hull V, 黄金燕, 刘 巅, 周季秋, 孙萌萌, 张和民. 野生大熊猫与放牧家畜的活动格局比较[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (3): 1071-1081 [Zhou SQ, Zhang JD, Hull V, Huang JY, Liu D, Zhou JQ, Sun MM, Zhang HM. Comparative activity patterns of wild giant pandas and livestock [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39 (3): 1071-1081]
23 刘巅, 黄金燕, 谢浩, 周世强, 张明春, 黄炎, 李德生, 刘明冲, 张和民. 汶川地震对卧龙自然保护区社区经济的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2014, 35 (6): 77-80 [Liu D, Huang JY, Xie H, Zhou SQ, Zhang MC, Huang Y, Li DS, Liu MC, Zhang HM. Effect of Wenchuan earthquake on community economy in Wolong Nature Reserve [J]. J Sichuan For Sci Technol, 2014, 35 (6): 77-80]
24 卧龙自然保护区管理局, 南充师范学院生物系, 四川省林业厅保护处. 卧龙植被及资源植物[M]. 成都: 四川科技出版社, 11-194 [Wolong Nature Reserve Administer, Biology Department of Nanchong Normal College, Conservation Department of Sichuan Forest Office. Wolong Plant Vegetation and Resource Plants [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing House of Science & Technology, 1987: 11-194]
25 Qiao MJ, Connor T, Shi XG, Huang J, Huang Y, Zhang HM, Ran JH. Population genetics reveals high connectivity of giant panda populations across human disturbance features in key nature reserve [J]. Ecol Evol, 2019, 9: 1809-1819
26 Huang J, Li YZ, Du LM, Yang B, Shen FJ, Zhang Hm, Zhang ZH, Zhang XY, Yue BS. Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellites in giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), with a focus on the applications of a novel microsatellite marker system [J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16: 61
27 叶卫平. Origin 9.1科技绘图及数据分析[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2015: 1-462 [Ye WP. Origin 9.1 Scientific and Technical Drawing and Data Analysis [M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2015: 1-462]
28 北京动物园. 大熊猫解剖: 系统解剖和器官组织学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986: 176-179 [Beijing Zoo. Anatomy of Giant Panda: Systematic Unbinding and Organ Histology [M]. Beijing, China: Science Publishing House, 1986: 176-179 ]
29 Hull V, Zhang JD, Zhou SQ, Huang JY, Li RG, Liu D, Xu WH, Huang Y, Ouyang ZY, Zhang HM, Liu JG. 2015. Space use by endangered giant pandas [J]. J Mammal, 96 (1): 230-236

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-10-25