|Table of Contents|

Characteristics of soil hydrological effects of alpine shrub meadow in western Sichuan(PDF)

Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

Issue:
2021 05
Page:
1170-1177
Research Field:
Articles
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Characteristics of soil hydrological effects of alpine shrub meadow in western Sichuan
Author(s):
L? Chen1 GONG Yuanbo1? GONG Wei1 CHE Mingxuan1 XU Manjing1 KANG Chengfang1 2 & WU Qiang3
1 College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China2 Gansu?Appraisal?Center?for?Eco-Environment?&?Engineering, Lanzhou 730000, China3 Luzhou Water Conservancy, Luzhou 646000, China
Keywords:
shrub meadow soil physical property water holding capacity infiltration performance
CLC:
-
PACS:
DOI:
10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.04029
DocumentCode:

Abstract:
The hydrological functions of soil infiltration and water retention are foundational to forest water and soil conservation. In order to investigate the differences in soil physical and chemical properties and hydrological effects at different altitudes and slope aspects, alpine shrub meadow soil from Zheduo Mountain, China, was selected for characterization. The basic physical properties, water holding capacity, and infiltration performance of the soil were studied. The results were as follows: (1) The influence of slope aspect and altitude on soil physical properties was mainly observed on the leached layer. Soil bulk density was generally higher in the sediment layer and semi-shady aspects than in the leaching layer and semi-sunny aspects; it was maximal in the 4 000 m semi-shady slope samples (1.21 g/cm3), and minimal in the 4 000 m semi-sunny slope samples (0.77 g/cm3), whereas total soil porosity showed the opposite pattern. (2) The natural soil water storage capacity, maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity, and minimum water holding capacity were higher in the leaching layer than in the sedimentary layer, whereas soil storage rainfall and effective storage capacity were higher in semi-sunny aspects than in semi-shady aspects. Soil maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity, cumulated rainfall, and effective cumulated storage capacity were highest in the leached layer at semi-sunny slope aspects below 4 000 m, with values of 1 336 (± 24.66), 1 016 (± 14.14), 710 (± 26.98), and 390 (± 14.14) t/hm2, respectively. (3) The initial soil infiltration rate and steady infiltration rate were generally higher in the leaching layer and semi-sunny slope than in the sedimentary layer and semi-shady slope. The maximum value of the soil infiltration coefficient, K10, was observed in the 4 200 m semi-slope leaching layer (7.41 mm/min) and the minimum value was observed in the 4 000 m semi-shady slope sediment layer (0.57 mm/min). We observed a clear differentiation of soil physical properties and hydrological functions under different altitudes and slope aspects. Research on soil hydrological functions of soil-rock mixed media may be the focus of future research on soil hydrology in this area.

References

1 Piayda A, Dubbert M, Siegwolf R, Cuntz M., Werner C. Quantification of dynamic soil-vegetation feedbacks following an isotopically labelled precipitation pulse [J]. Biogeosciences, 2017, 14 (9): 2293-2306
2 Tomas V, Michal D, Jaromir D, Jana V, Miroslav T. Macroscopic modeling of plant water uptake in a forest stand involving root-mediated soil water redistribution [J]. Vadose Zone J, 2013, 12 (1): 1-12
3 Gan M, Jia YH, Shao MA, Guo CJ, Li TC. Permanent gully increases the heterogeneity of soil water retention capacity across a slope-gully system [J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2019, 272: 206-217
4 Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B, Liaghat A, Genuchten MTV. Estimation of the van genuchten soil water retention properties from soil textural data [J]. Pedosphere, 2010, 20 (4): 456-465
5 张晓霞, 杨宗儒, 查同刚, 张志强, 王高敏, 朱聿申, 吕志远. 晋西黄土区退耕还林22年后林地土壤物理性质的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (2): 416-424 [Zhang XX, Yang ZR, Zha TG, Zhang ZQ, Wang GM, Zhu LS, Lü ZY. Changes in the physical properties of soil in forestlands after 22 years under the influence of the conversion of cropland into farmland project in loess region, western shanxi province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37 (2): 416-424]
6 Shwetha P, Varija K. Soil water retention curve from saturated hydraulic conductivity for sandy loam and loamy sand textured soils [J]. Aquat Prod, 2015 (4): 1142-1149
7 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰. 三峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27 (8): 1809-1818 [Li XF, Liu MX, Yi J, Wu SP, Yang YP, Lou SL. Soil hydrological function of different altitudinal hillslopes of the three gorges mountain and its impact factors [J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27 (8): 1809-1818]
8 Zhu Q, Nie XF, Zhou XB, Liao KH, Li HP. Soil moisture response to rainfall at different topographic positions along a mixed land-use hillslope [J]. Catena, 2014, 119: 61-70
9 Qu WJ, Chen L, Wang L, Wang X, Song NP, Yang XG. Local soil hydrological effects of nebkha creation in a degraded artificial Caragana shrubland [J]. Ecol Eng, 2019, 131: 27-33
10 Demirel K, Kavd RY. Effect of soil water retention barriers on turfgrass growth and soil water content [J]. Irrigation Sci, 2013, 31 (4): 689-700
11 Su B, Huang J, Zeng X, Gao C, Jiang T. Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the upper yangtze river basin [J].?Clim Change,?141 (3): 533-546
12 李炳元, 潘保田, 程维明, 韩嘉福, 齐德利, 朱澈. 中国地貌区划新论[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68 (3): 291-306 [Li BY, Pan BT, Cheng WM, Han JF, Qi DL, Zhu C. Research on geomorphological regionalization of China [J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2013, 68 (3): 291-306]
13 Jun X, Miao LW. Runoff changes and distributed hydrologic simulation in the upper reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Res Sci, 2008, 30 (7): 962-967
14 Hou J, Ye A, You J, Ma F, Duan Q. An estimate of human and natural contributions to changes in water resources in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 635 (1): 901-912
15 康成芳, 宫渊波, 车明轩, 许蔓菁, 吕宸, 刘韩. 川西高寒山地灌丛草甸不同海拔土壤有机碳矿化的季节动态[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (4): 1367-1375 [Kang CF, Gong YB, Che MX, Xu MJ, Lü C, Liu H. Seasonal dynamics of soil organic carbon mineralization for alpine shrub meadow at different elevations, western Sichuan [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40 (4): 1367-1375]
16 Wu TN, Wu GL, Wang D, Shi ZH. Soil-hydrological properties response to grazing exclusion in a steppe grassland of the Loess Plateau [J]. Environ ert ecs, 2014, 71 (2): 745-752
17 张万儒, 杨光滢, 屠星南. 森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000 [Zhang WR, Yang GY, Tu XN. Forest Soil Analysis Method [M]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2000]
18 程欢, 程一伦, 宫渊波, 熊仕臣, 张亚贝, 刘江山, 刘良松, 吴强, 孙超.川西北高山/亚高山区6种典型土壤类型水文效应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25 (2): 225-231 [Cheng H, Cheng YL, Gong YB, Xiong SC, Zhang YB, Liu JS, Liu LS, Wu Q, Su C. Hydrological effect of six soil types in northwestern Sichuan alpine and subalpine mountains [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2019, 25 (2): 225-231]
19 李宗超, 胡霞. 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对退化沙质草地土壤孔隙特征的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52 (1): 242-248 [Li ZC, Hu X. Effects of shrub( caragana microphylla lam) encroachment on soil porosity of degraded sandy grassland [J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2015, 52 (1): 242-248]
20 王军德, 王根绪, 陈玲. 高寒草甸土壤水分的影响因子及其空间变异研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2006, 28 (3): 428-433 [Wang JD, Wang GX, Chen L. Impact factors to soil moisture of alpine meadow and their spatial heterogeneity [J]. J Glaciol Geocryol, 2006,28 (3): 428-433]
21 樊博, 林丽, 曹广民, 柯浔, 李以康, 杜岩功, 郭小伟, 李茜, 钱大文, 兰玉婷, 周春丽. 不同演替状态下高寒草甸土壤物理性质与植物根系的相互关系[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 2 (7): 1-10 [Fan B, Lin L, Cao GM, Ke X, Li YK, Du YG, Guo XW, Li Q, Qian DW, Lan YT, Zhou CL. Rwlationship between plant roots and physical soil propertise in alpine meadows at different degradation stages [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 2 (7): 1-10]
22 Moreno-de las Heras M, Merino-Martín L, Nicolau JM. Effect of vegetation cover on the hydrology of reclaimed mining soils under mediterranean-continental climate [J]. Catena, 2009, 77 (1): 39-47
23 Bryk M, Ko?odziej B, S?owinska-Jurkiewicz A, Jaroszuk-Sierocinska M. uation of soil structure and physical properties inflfluenced by weather conditions during autumn-winter-spring season [J]. Soil Till Res, 2017, 170 (7): 66-76
24 ?imansk? V, Polláková N, Jonczak J. Is Better minimum than standard mouldboard ploughing tillage from viewpoint of the pore-size distribution and soil water retention characteristic changes? [J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2016, 49 (3): 17-26.
25 高强伟, 代斌, 罗承德, 刘丽, 马丹, 张翠翠. 蜀南竹海毛竹林土壤物理性质空间异质性[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (8): 2255-2263 [Gao EQ, Dai B, Luo CD, Liu L, Ma D, Zhang CC. Spatial heterogeneity of soil physical properties in Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens forest, south Sichuan bamboo sea [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36 (8): 2255-2263]
26 李小英, 段争虎, 陈小红, 谭明亮. 黄土高原西部人工灌木林土壤水分分布规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31 (1): 38-43 [Li XY, Duan ZH, Chen XH, Tan ML.Distribution of soil moisture under different planted shrubs on the west Loess Plateau [J]. Arid Zone Res, 2014, 31 (1): 38-43]
27 刘目兴, 吴丹, 崔文虎. 长江三峡山地不同垂直带土壤入渗研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29 (3): 56-61[Liu MX, Wu D, Cui WH. Study on soil infiltration in different altitudinal mountain belts of the three gorges region of Yantze River [J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2015, 29 (3): 56-61]
28 程欢, 付雨欣, 董洪君, 胡旭, 黄川雄, 刘益君, 车明轩, 付万权, 宫渊波. 川中丘陵区不同植被类型土壤理化性质及水文效应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25 (4): 845-853 [Cheng H, Fu YX, Dong HJ, Hu X, Huang CX, Liu YJ, Che MX, Fu WQ, Gong YB. Physical and chemical properties of soil and the hydrological effects of different vegetation?types in the central Sichuan hilly region [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2019, 25 (4): 845-853]
29 Rachman A, Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ, Thompson AL. Influence of stiff-stemmed grass hedge systems on infiltration [J]. Sol Sci Am J, 2004, 68 (6): 2000-2006
30 朱美壮, 王根绪, 肖瑶, 胡兆永, 宋春林, 黄克威. 青藏高原多年冻土区高寒草甸土壤水分入渗变化研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39 (6): 1316-1325 [Zhu MZ, Wang GX, Xiao Y, Hu ZY, Song CL, Huang KW. A study on the changes of soil water infiltration in alpine meadow of permafrost regions in the Tibetan Plateau [J]. J Glaciol Geocryol, 2017, 39 (6): 1316-1325]
31 Wang Y, Meng F, Geng F, Jing H, Zhao N. Investigating water permeation through the soil-rock mixture in underground engineering [J]. Pol J Environ Stud, 2017, 26 (4): 1777-1788

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-10-25