|Table of Contents|

Effects of temperature on the mixed storage fermentation quality of dry corn stalk and cabbage wastes and their microbial communities

Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

Issue:
2019 03
Page:
719-728
Research Field:
Articles
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of temperature on the mixed storage fermentation quality of dry corn stalk and cabbage wastes and their microbial communities
Author(s):
REN Haiwei1 2 3 FENG Yingping1 LIU Tong1 WANG Yu2 3 LI ZhiZhong1** PEI Jiawen1 WANG Lei1 & LI Panpan1
1School of Life Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China 2China Western Energy & Environment Research Center, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China 3Key Laboratory of Complementary Energy System of Biomass and Solar Energy, Lanzhou 730050, China
Keywords:
dry corn stalk (DCS) cabbage waste (CW) storage temperature mixed silage quality microbial community diversity high-throughput sequencing
CLC:
Q938.1:X712
PACS:
DOI:
10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.201909024
DocumentCode:

Abstract:
The objective of this study was to investigate whether the mixed storage quality of dry corn stalk and cabbage wastes was affected by different temperatures. Three treatments, including low temperature (-3 ± 1 ℃, LX), room temperature (18 ± 1 ℃, RX), and medium temperature (34 ± 1 ℃, MX) treatments, were conducted in accordance with the climatic conditions in Northwest China. All of the experimental groups were stored for 90 successive days based on the theory of ensiling. Furthermore, the sensory quality, content of organic compounds, and fermentation quality were analyzed after 30 and 90 days of storage, respectively. Moreover, the high-throughput sequencing technology of Illumina Miseq was used to analyze the changes in bacterial community diversity that occurred during ensiling. Results showed that the content of dry matter and lactic acid in the RX and MX groups were significantly higher than those in the LX group (P < 0.05), while the ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen and the content of water-soluble carbohydrates and cellulose were significantly lower in these than in the LX group (P < 0.05) after 30 days. After storage for 90 days, the pH, neutral detergent fiber content, and the ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen in the RX group were significantly lower than those in the LX and MX groups (P < 0.05). The ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid and that of lactic acid to total organic acids were higher in the RX group than those in the LX and MX groups throughout the three-month storage period, indicating that the fermentation intensity of the Lactobacillus series was increased in this treatment. The butyric acid content was lower, and the biodegradation potential, sensory quality, and Flieg score were higher, in all three treatments compared to those in un-stored raw materials, indicating that all of them achieved good storage quality. The results of analyses of bacterial community diversity showed that the dominant bacteria at the phylum level in all three treatments were Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, and the relative abundance of Firmicutes in the LX and RX groups was significantly higher than that in un-stored raw materials. The dominant bacteria at the genus level in all three treatments were Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium, Leuconostoc, and genera within the family Enterobacteriaceae. The relative abundances of spoilage bacteria, such as genera of Enterobacteriaceae, in the LX and RX groups were lower than those in the MX group, while the relative abundances of Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Carnobacterium were higher in these than in the MX group. In conclusion, the room temperature (18 ± 1 ℃) treatment was found to be the most beneficial in this study because it improved the strength of lactic acid fermentation while inhibiting the growth of spoilage bacteria and optimizing and recombining the composition of organic acids and other organic components in the ensilage to achieve higher storage quality.

References

1 石祖梁, 贾涛, 王亚静, 王久臣, 孙仁华, 王飞, 李想, 毕于运. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用现状及焚烧碳排放估算[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38 (9): 32-37 [Shi ZL, Jia J, Wang YJ, Wang JC, Sun RH, Li X, Bi YY. Comprehensive utilization of crop straw in China and estimation of carbon emission from incineration [J]. Chin J Agric Resour Region Plan, 2017, 38 (9): 32-37]
2 常瑞雪. 蔬菜废弃物超高温堆肥工艺构建及其过程中的氮素损失研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017 [Chang RX. Research on ultra high temperature compost process and nitrogen loss during vegetable waste composting [D]. Beijing: China agricultural university, 2017]
3 任海伟, 王聪, 马延琴, 李志忠, 范文广, 王昱, 张丙云, 秦州州, 余倩倩. 接种不同乳酸菌对干玉米秸秆与白菜废弃物混贮品质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (3): 547-556 [Ren HW, Wang C, Ma YQ, Li ZZ, Fan WG, Wang Y, Zhang BY, Qin ZZ, Yu QQ. Effects of inoculating different lactic acid bacteria on the mixed storage quality of dry maize straw and cabbage waste [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (3): 547-556]
4 Agneessens L, Viaene J, Vanden NT, Vandecasteeleb B, De NS. Effect of ensilaged vegetable crop residue amendments on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics [J]. Sci Horticult, 2015, 192: 311-319
5 Weiss K, Kroschewski B, Auerbach H. Effects of air exposure, temperature and additives on fermentation characteristics, yeast count, aerobic stability and volatile organic compounds in corn silage [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99 (10): 8053-8069
6 Zhou Y, Drouin P, Lafrenière C. Effect of temperature (5-25 °C) on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria populations and fermentation of whole-plant corn silage [J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2016, 121 (3): 657-671
7 Kondo M, Shimizu K, Jayanegara A, Mishima T, Matsui H, Karita S, Goto M, Fujihara T. Changes in nutrient composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of total mixed ration silage stored at different temperatures and periods[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2016, 96 (4): 1175-1180
8 冯巧娟, 朱琳, 吴安琪, 张建国. 青贮时间和温度对木薯块根和叶发酵品质及氢氰酸含量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35 (5): 1293-1298 [Feng QJ, Zhu L, Wu AQ, Zhang JG. Effect of ensiling time and temperature on the fermentaion quality and content of hydrocyanic acid in cassava roots and leaves [J]. Pratacult Sci, 2018, 35 (5): 1293-1298]
9 Li LH, Sun YM, Yuan ZH, Kong XY, Wao Y, Yang LG, Zhang Y, Li D. Effect of microalgae supplementation on the silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Manyflower silvergrass [J]. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 189 (10) : 334-340
10 胡宗福, 常杰, 萨仁呼, 王思珍, 牛化欣. 基于宏基因组学技术检测全株玉米青贮期间和暴露空气后的微生物多样性[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29 (10): 3750-3760 [Hu ZF, Chang J, Sarnhu, Wang SZ, Niu HX. Microbial diversity of whole-plant maize during ensilage and after air exposure analyzed by metagenomics technology [J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2017, 29 (10) : 1-11]
11 陶莲, 刁其玉. 青贮发酵对玉米秸秆品质及菌群构成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28 (1): 198-207 [Tao L, Diao QY. Effects of ensiling on qualityand bacteria composition of corn stalk [J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2016, 28 (1): 198-207]
12 刘晶晶. 生物添加剂对柳枝稷青贮的作用及机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015 [Liu JJ. Effect of lactic acid bacteria and fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of switchgrass silage and mechanism involved [D]. Beijing: China agricultural university, 2015]
13 冯骁骋, 曾洁, 李伟军, 高静, 王志军. 天然草原牧草青贮饲料评级体系进展研究. 草原与草业, 2016, 28 (1): 48-52 [Feng XC, Zeng J, LI WJ, Gao J, Wang ZJ. Study on progress of grading system for natural grassland silage [J]. Grassl Pratacult, 2016, 28 (1): 48-52]
14 陈冠舟, 张白鹭, 纪梦梦,吴晓刚, 周君仪, 陈家楠, 王芸, 田浩, 张晓君. 高通量测序探究啮食聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料黄粉虫的肠道菌群结构[J]. 微生物学通报, 2017, 44 (9): 2011-2018 [Chen GZ, Zhang BL, Ji MM, Wu XG, Zhou JY, Chen JN, Wang Y, Tian H, Zhang XJ. Gut microbiota of polystyrene-eating mealworms analyzed by high-throughput sequencing [J]. Microbiol Chin, 2017, 44 (9): 2011-2018]
15 张立成, 肖卫华, 彭沛宇, 廖健程, 丁鑫, 胡德勇. 稻—稻—油菜轮作土壤细菌群落的特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (2): 276-280 [Zhang LC, Xiao WH, Peng PY, Liao JC, Ding X, Hu DY. Soil bacterial community characteristics of rice-rice-rape crop rotation [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (2): 276-280]
16 Wang C, Nishino N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products,aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage [J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2013, 114 (6): 1687-1695
17 秦丽萍, 柯文灿, 丁武蓉,石超, 郭旭生. 温度对垂穗披碱草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30 (9): 1433-1438 [Qin LP, Ke WC, Ding WR, Shi C, Guo XS, Effect of temperature on the quality of silage of elymus nutans [J]. Pratacult Sci, 2013, 30 (9): 1433-1438]
18 尹福泉, 吴征敏, 王志敬, 吴浩浩, 兰瑞霞, 赵志辉. 皇竹草和喷浆玉米皮混合对瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35 (7): 1797-1804 [Yin FQ, Wu ZM, Wang ZJ, Wu HH, Lan RX, Zhao ZH. Effect of the combination of Pennisetum sine seand sprouting corn bran on rumen fermentation characteristics [J]. Pratacult Sci, 2018, 35 (7): 1797-1804]
19 Zhang M, Lv HX, Tan ZF, Li Y, Wang YP, Pang HL, Li ZW, Jiao Z, Jin QS. Improving the fermentation quality of wheat straw silage stored at low temperature by psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria [J]. Anim Sci J, 2017, 88 (2): 277-285
20 O’Neil KA, Allen MS. Effects of temperature and duration of sample storage before oven-drying on forage fiber analyses [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1993, 76 (2): 535-543
21 Liu QH, Chen MX, Zhang JG, Shi SL, Cai Y. Characteristics of isolated lactic acid bacteria and their effectiveness to improve stylo (Stylosanthes guianensis Sw.) silage quality at various temperatures [J]. Anim Sci J, 2012, 83 (2): 128-135
22 段小果, 李博, 贺银凤. 乳酸菌与酵母菌共生机理的研究进展[J] . 微生物学通报, 2017, 44 (8) : 1988- 1995 [Duan XG, Li B, He YF. Progress in symbiotic mechanism between lactic acid bacteria and yeast [J]. Microbiol Chin, 2017, 44 (8) : 1988-1995]
23 贾晶霞, 梁宝忠, 王艳红, 赵永亮, 李建成. 不同汽爆预处理对干玉米秸秆青贮效果的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29 (20): 192-198 [Jia JX, Liang BZ, Wang YH, Zhao YL, Li JZ.. Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on ensiling performance of dry corn stover [J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2013, 29 (20): 192-198]
24 Zhang JG, Kawamoto H, Cai YM. Relationships between the addition rates of cellulase or glucose and fermentation at different temperatures [J]. Anim Sci J, 2010, 81 (3): 325-330
25 刘秦华, 李湘玉, 李君风 ,白晰, 张建国, 邵涛, 吴琳, 赵新国, 田佳鹭. 温度和添加剂对象草青贮发酵品质、α-生育酚和β-胡萝卜素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24 (7): 116-122 [Liu QH, Li XY, Li JF, Bai X, Zhang JG, Shao T, Wu L, Zhao XG, Tian JL. Effect of temperature and additives on fermentation and α-tocopherol and β-carotene content of Pennisetum purpureum silage [J]. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2015, 24 (7): 116-122]
26 Liu QH, Shao T, Bai YF. The effect of fibrolytic enzyme; Lactobacillus plantarum, and two food antioxidants on the fermentation quality; alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene of high moisture napier grass silage ensiled at different temperatures [J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2016, 221: 1-11
27 阴法庭, 张凤华. 饲料油菜与玉米秸秆混合青贮营养品质[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35 (7): 1790-1796. [Yin FT, Zhang FH. Nutritional quality of silage made with different ratios of forage rape and corn stalks [J]. Pratacult Sci, 2018, 35 (7): 1790- 1796]
28 Bernardes TF, Jlp D, Adesogan A T, McAllister TA, Drouin P,Nussio LG, Huhtanen P, Tremblay GF, Bélanger G, Cai Y. Silage review: unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2018, 101 (5): 4001-4019
29 Kim SC, Adesogan AT. Influence of ensiling temperature, simulated rainfall, and delayed sealing on fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of corn silage [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89 (8): 3122-3132
30 Pitta DW, Pinchak E, Dowd SE, Osterstock J, Gontcharova V, Youn E, Dorton K, Yoon I, Min BR, Fulford JD, Wickersham TA, Malinowski DP. Rumen bacterial diversity dynamics associated with changing from bermudagrass hay to grazed winter wheat diets [J]. Microb Ecol, 2010, 59 (3): 511-522
31 程银华, 雷雪芹, 徐廷生, 王青青, 田英申. 玉米秸秆揉丝微贮与传统青贮饲料发酵过程中pH和微生物的变化[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2014, 42 (5): 17-21 [Cheng YH, Lei XQ, Wang QQ, Tian YS. Changes of pH and microorganism during the fermentation of microbial and traditional silages with corn straw knead wire [J]. J Northwest A&F Univ, 2014, 42 (5): 17-21]
32 Kadivar H, Stapleton AE. Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity [J]. Microb Ecol, 2003, 45 (4): 353-361
33 秦丽萍. 青藏高原垂穗披碱草青贮饲料中耐低温乳酸菌的筛选及其发酵性能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2014 [Qin LP. Screening of lactic acid bacteria for low temperature fermentation from silage of Elymus nutans growing on the Tibeten Plateau and study on its fermentation properties [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2014]
34 张庆. 饲草青贮用乳酸菌的筛选及作用机理[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2016 [Zhang Q. Studies on screening mechanism of action of lactic acid bacteria for forage ensiling [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014]
35 Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology [J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2002, 66 (3): 506-577
36 买尔哈巴?艾合买提, 樊振, 李越中, 古丽斯玛依?艾拜都拉, 乌斯满?依米提. 瘤胃中纤维素分解菌的分离、鉴定及其产酶条件的优化[J]. 微生物学报, 2013, 53 (5): 470-477 [Maierhaba Aihemaiti, Fan Z, Li YZ, Gulisimayi Aibaidoula, Wusiman Yimit. Isolation and identification of rumen bacteria for cellulolytic enzyme production [J]. Acta Microbiol Sin, 2013, 53 (5): 470-477]

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-06-25