|Table of Contents|

Analysis and Prediction of Protein Interaction Network of Ralstonia solanacearum(PDF)

Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

2012 01
Research Field:
T & M
Publishing date:


Analysis and Prediction of Protein Interaction Network of Ralstonia solanacearum
JIANG Chunlei ZHAO rui LÜ Lingfeng QIAO Dairong CAO Yi
(Sichuan Public Experiment Platform of Bioinformatics and Metabolic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)
Ralstonia solanacearum protein interaction networks protein function proteomic bacterial wilt Naïve Bayes model
S432 : Q936

Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a worldwide soil-borne bacterial diseases. The complete sequence of Ralstonia solanacearum genome make it possible to analysis the protein-protein interaction networks of R. solanacearum from the proteomic. In this paper, Naïve Bayes model was used to integrate seven kinds of methods (Phylogenetic profile, gene neighbor method, gene fusion, operon method, interolog, microarray, domain interactions) and predict protein interactions of R. solanacearum. The reliable networks were obtained based on threshold determined by Youden’s index. The secretion system and signal transduction system were analyzed and possible drug targets (cyaB, pilD, Fli, Rsp1526, VsrA, VsrB, PilH) were suggested. The function of proteins without comments in COG database was inferred according to protein-protein interaction. A completely free online database support was provided, including convenient queries and download for R. solanacearum protein interaction and function data (http://www.scbmp.org.cn/rsoppi.php). Fig 8, Tab 1, Ref 25


1 Pellegrini M, Marcotte EM, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D, Yeates D. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 4285~4288
2 Overbeek R, Fonstein M, D’Souza M, Pusch GD, Maltsev N. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1999, 96: 2896~2901
3 Strong M, Mallick P, Pellegrini M, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D. Inference of protein function and protein linkages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on prokaryotic genome organization: A combined computational approach. Genome Biol, 2003, 4: R59
4 Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Ng HL, Rice DW, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 1999, 285: 751~753
5 Marcotte CJV, Marcotte EM. Predicting functional linkages from gene fusions with confidence. Appl Bioinformatics, 2002, 1 (2): 93~100
6 Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J, Ge H, Davis BP, Garrels J, Vincent S, Vidal M. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein–protein interactions or “interologs”. Genome Res, 2001, 11 (12): 2120~2126
7 Ng SK, Zhang Z, Tan SH, Lin K. InterDom: A database of putative interacting protein domains for validating predicted protein interactions and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003, 31 (1): 251~254
8 Ge H, Liu Z, Church GM. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet, 2001, 29 (4): 482~486
9 Sun JC, Xu JL, Liu Z, Liu Q, Zhao A, Shi TL, Li YX. Refined phylogenetic profiles method for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21 (16): 3409~3415
10 Date SV, Marcotte EM. Discovery of uncharacterized cellular systems by genome-wide analysis of functional linkages. Nat Biotechnol, 2003, 21 (9): 1055~1062
11 Dandekar T, Snel B, Huynen M, Bork P. Conservation of gene order: A fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem Sci, 1998, 23 (9): 324~328
12 Yu H, Luscombe NM, Lu HX, Zhu X, Xia Y, Han JD, Bertin N, Chung S, Vidal M, Gerstein M. Annotation transfer etween genomes: Protein– protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res, 2004, 14 (6): 1107~1118
13 Hand DJ, Yu K. Idiot’s Bayes-not so stupid after all? Intern Stat Rev, 2001, 69 (3): 385~398
14 Domingos P, Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning, 1997, 29: 103~130
15 Fath MJ, Kolter R. ABC transporters: Bacterial exporters. Microbiol Rev, 1993, 57 (4): 995~1017
16 Finlay BB, Falkow S. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 1997, 61 (2): 136~169
17 Salmond GP, Reeves PJ. Membrane traffic wardens and protein secretion in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Biochem Sci, 1993, 18 (1): 7~12
18 Van Gijsegem F, Genin S, Boucher C. Conservation of secretion pathways for pathogenicity determinants of plant and animal bacteria. Trends Microbiol, 1993, 1: 175~1801
19 Winans SC, Burns DL, Christie PJ. Adaptation of a conjugal transfer system for the export of pathogenic macromolecules. Trends Microbiol, 1996, 4 (2): 64~68
20 Vasse J, Genin S, Frey P, Boucher C, Brito B. The hrpB and hrpG regulatory genes of Ralstonia solanacearum are required for different stages of the tomato root infection process. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2000, 13 (3): 259~267
21 Gentschev I, Dietrich G, Goebel W. The E. coli alpha–hemolysin secretion system and its use in vaccine development. Trends Microbiol, 2002, 10 (1): 39~45
22 Rossier O, Starkenburg SR, Cianciotto NP. Legionella pneumophila type II protein secretion promotes virulence in the A/J mouse model of Legionnaires’ disease pneumonia. Infect Immun, 2004, 72 (1): 310~321
23 Schell MA. Control of virulence and pathogenicity genes of Ralstonia solanacearum by an elaborate sensory network. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2000, 38: 263~292
24 Alfano JR, Collmer A. Type Ⅲ secretion system effector protein: double agents in bacterial disease and plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2004, 42: 385~414
25 Yip CK, Kimbrough TG, Felise HB, Vuckovic M, Thomas NA, Pfuetzner RA, Finlay BB, Miller SI, Strynadka NC. Structural characterization of the molecular platform for type III secretion system assembly. Nature, 2005, 435 (7042): 702~707


Last Update: 2012-02-29